Turn a TradingView strategy result into evidence you can question.

TradingView strategy reports are useful, but they do not settle data quality, execution realism, overfit risk, or whether the result is stable outside the exact setup shown. VaultTrade reviews the evidence without giving trade calls.

Common risk signals

Why traders ask for a review.

  • The strategy tester result looks promising, but the assumptions are unclear.
  • Screenshots do not show enough about costs, sessions, filters, or trade dependency.
  • A script has been tuned repeatedly and needs an independent overfit check.
  • You need a report you can use to decide what evidence to gather next.
What gets checked

Evidence pressure, not trade calls.

  • Submitted rule scope and visible tester settings
  • Cost, slippage, commission, and execution assumptions
  • Trade distribution, concentration, and sensitivity red flags
  • Evidence gaps that prevent a stronger conclusion
  • Research-only verdict and retest checklist
Useful submission material

What to send first.

Start with a short strategy description and the evidence you already have. Public intake does not require file upload; follow-up happens after scope is agreed.

Strategy tester screenshotsClosed-trade export if availablePine rules summary or non-sensitive script excerptsMarket, timeframe, session, and cost assumptions

Research-only boundary

VaultTrade Reality Check is research-only. It does not provide financial advice, investment recommendations, trading signals, copy trading, portfolio management, or execution.

Give the strategy a fair test before you rely on the story.

Submit the context, assumptions, and evidence you have. The first response confirms scope and whether the evidence is enough for a useful review.

Request a TradingView Evidence Review