A bot backtest is not proof until the assumptions survive pressure.
Automation can make a fragile strategy fail faster. VaultTrade reviews submitted bot evidence for the weak points that often sit behind attractive automation claims: data quality, cost realism, concentration, and unstable parameter choices.
The bot result may depend on perfect fills or optimistic fees.
Parameter choices may be too closely tuned to one sample.
Win/loss behaviour may change sharply across regimes or sessions.
You need a written evidence report before adding more complexity.
What gets checked
Evidence pressure, not trade calls.
Bot rule scope and automation assumptions
Cost, spread, slippage, and turnover pressure
Parameter fragility and sample concentration
Trade-log consistency and data-quality issues
Research-only verdict with risk notes
Useful submission material
What to send first.
Start with a short strategy description and the evidence you already have. Public intake does not require file upload; follow-up happens after scope is agreed.
Backtest report or bot dashboard exportTrade logs or CSVsRule summary and parameter notesCost model and exchange/market assumptions
Research-only boundary
VaultTrade Reality Check is research-only. It does not provide financial advice, investment recommendations, trading signals, copy trading, portfolio management, or execution.
Give the strategy a fair test before you rely on the story.
Submit the context, assumptions, and evidence you have. The first response confirms scope and whether the evidence is enough for a useful review.